TEAM Environmental buyer-window signal capture

Evidence

• EPA's 21 August 2026 extract reports four recent CWA violation quarters and a current status of Violation Identified for Global Pumice in Olancha.
• The same federal record identifies improper reporting and failure to properly operate and maintain nonconstruction stormwater BMPs.
• Global Pumice publishes its Olancha operation and a direct company contact route.

Practical opening

“EPA's current extract reports four recent CWA violation quarters at Global Pumice's Olancha facility. EPA identifies improper reporting and failure to properly operate and maintain industrial-stormwater BMPs. That suggests a regulator-ready recovery file can start with the cited record. We could reconcile the cited reporting and BMP items into one regulator-ready corrective file.”

Claim boundaryDo not claim the cited items remain open, Global Pumice lacks a consultant, or budget has been approved.

The public record does not show which corrective items remain open or whether a consultant is engaged.

Decision ownerThomas Hrubik, Owner and member · thrubik@globalpumice.com · 760-240-3544

Evidence

• CPUC's current Federal Funding Account awards page lists Stimulus Technologies' Inyo-5 project as approved.
• CPUC awarded up to $2,767,851 and requires a PEA before first payment; it cannot release construction funds until CEQA review is complete.
• Stimulus identifies Nathan Whittacre as its chief executive officer and documents its regional broadband operation.
• The official Darwin project record publishes Nathan Whittacre's direct email and phone.

Practical opening

“CPUC's current awards page lists Stimulus Technologies' Inyo-5 project as approved. CPUC requires a PEA before first payment and withholds construction funds until CEQA review is complete. That suggests a local environmental package can move the project from award to authorization. We could assemble the PEA, local field studies, mitigation record, and agency-ready project description.”

Claim boundaryDo not claim the PEA is unassigned, construction is imminent, or the full award is available for TEAM.

CPUC or the engineering prime may already control environmental procurement, so the incumbent path needs one manual validation call.

Decision ownerNathan Whittacre, Chief Executive Officer · nathan@stimulustech.com · 702-479-1040

Evidence

• Inyo County's current-projects page lists the Leatham commercial-reuse application and its public project documents.
• Inyo County conditioned the commercial reuse on complete permit materials and a public water system supply permit for Pool Water System CA1400080.
• The county record identifies Karen Leatham as applicant and describes a vacant 24,100-square-foot building planned for multiple commercial tenant spaces.
• EPA's 9 July 2026 drinking-water extract records Pool Water System CA1400080 as inactive.
• A current company operating at 2290 Dixon Lane publishes 760-873-8491 for the Bishop facility.

Practical opening

“Inyo County currently lists the Leatham commercial-reuse project. Inyo County requires a public-water-system permit for the commercial reuse. EPA's latest extract records Pool Water System CA1400080 as inactive. That suggests a bounded water and agency package can clear the occupancy path. We could map the permit gap and assemble the source, sampling, water-quality, and agency submission package.”

Claim boundaryDo not claim the permit is untouched, no consultant is engaged, or TEAM can provide certified operation or civil design.

The applicant may already have an engineer, operator, or water specialist assembling the permit file.

Decision ownerKaren Leatham, Project applicant for the 2290 Dixon Lane reuse · 760-873-8491